Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.0.1 (build 4023) - 16 May 2024

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

WN34S (probe) sensor question

GW1000 WiFi gateway
Post Reply
Nossie
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2022 8:01 pm
Weather Station: Ecowitt 2551
Operating System: Raspberry Pi5 Debian Bookworm
Location: Stewarton, East Ayrshire UK
Contact:

WN34S (probe) sensor question

Post by Nossie »

Hi

I acquired a few new sensors today, one of them being the WN34S I've set it up and put it in the ground as a soil temperature sensor. I'm slightly confused with my options.... With CMX it has registered itself as a user temperature and not a soil temp. First - is the soil temp in extra sensors for something like Davis or is that used by Ecowitt too?

Secondly, if so would that have only been possible if the soil temp sensor was registering itself as T&H?
Ian.

http://www.StewartonWeather.com
Containerised Cumulus[MX] 3.28.0 (build: 3269) ● CumulusUtils Version 6.23.0● Ecowitt 2551/WH65/T&HP/WH57/WH45/3x WH51 ● Pi 5 8GB ● Debian Bookworm ● Ubuntu Server Host
Nossie
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2022 8:01 pm
Weather Station: Ecowitt 2551
Operating System: Raspberry Pi5 Debian Bookworm
Location: Stewarton, East Ayrshire UK
Contact:

Re: WN34S (probe) sensor question

Post by Nossie »

Is it really as simple as this screenshot?> I just don't want to overwrite something I shouldnt

viewtopic.php?p=163364&hilit=soil+temperature#p163364

Usersensor temperature 1 is the soil temp one and then just allocate it to the first
WN34 channel 1?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ian.

http://www.StewartonWeather.com
Containerised Cumulus[MX] 3.28.0 (build: 3269) ● CumulusUtils Version 6.23.0● Ecowitt 2551/WH65/T&HP/WH57/WH45/3x WH51 ● Pi 5 8GB ● Debian Bookworm ● Ubuntu Server Host
User avatar
HansR
Posts: 6058
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2012 6:53 am
Weather Station: GW1100 (WS80/WH40)
Operating System: Raspberry OS/Bookworm
Location: Wagenborgen (NL)
Contact:

Re: WN34S (probe) sensor question

Post by HansR »

Yes. I think it is (never done that though).
Hans

https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl
CMX build 4023+ ● RPi 3B+ ● Raspbian Linux 6.1.21-v7+ armv7l ● dotnet 8.0.3
Nossie
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2022 8:01 pm
Weather Station: Ecowitt 2551
Operating System: Raspberry Pi5 Debian Bookworm
Location: Stewarton, East Ayrshire UK
Contact:

Re: WN34S (probe) sensor question

Post by Nossie »

Looks like I was confusing myself with all the different variations =) thanks!
Ian.

http://www.StewartonWeather.com
Containerised Cumulus[MX] 3.28.0 (build: 3269) ● CumulusUtils Version 6.23.0● Ecowitt 2551/WH65/T&HP/WH57/WH45/3x WH51 ● Pi 5 8GB ● Debian Bookworm ● Ubuntu Server Host
User avatar
Gyvate
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed 16 Dec 2020 2:14 pm
Weather Station: GW1x00/WH2650WiFi/HP2553/GW2000
Operating System: Win 11 (PC/RPi), Raspbian 11,WSL
Location: Saarbrücken, Germany
Contact:

Re: WN34S (probe) sensor question

Post by Gyvate »

the WN34 sensors are defined in the Ecowitt Gateway API (aka GW1000 API) as user temperature sensors, what in a way makes sense as they come in two variants - as WN34S (S=soil) for soil temperature and as WN34L (L=liquid) for water (or other liquids).
While assigning a WN34S to the Soil temperature sensors may make sense to you - if you like to see them in the CMX interface in that section, a WN34L wouldn't make much sense there, would it?
And the consoles cannot tell the difference between L and S.
Even though the Ecowitt Gateway API definition also knows 16 soil temperature sensors, they have not been populated yet with an existing sensor model. And the current console firmware doesn't know them (yet).
But you can of course map them to soil temperature in CMX the way you described.
Post Reply